Top 5 Challenges in Global Regulatory Monitoring

If you work in compliance or regulatory affairs in 2025, you’ve probably felt a growing sense that the regulatory world is spinning faster than ever before. This isn’t your imagination. What industry experts are calling “regulatory divergence” has created a storm of policy shifts happening simultaneously across multiple countries and regions.

Let’s be honest: keeping up with global regulatory changes has never been easy, but it’s reached a whole new level of complexity. Companies are expanding globally while regulatory frameworks evolve at breakneck speed, and the margin for error gets narrower by the day.

The numbers, however tell the real story. Poor data quality alone is costing organizations millions each year, while non-compliance penalties can reach into the billions. With regulatory intensity driving up costs and creating anxiety across industries, understanding these core challenges can be extremely helpful.

Challenge 1: Managing Multi-Jurisdictional Complexity

Navigating the detailed web of regulatory frameworks across regions along with countries is the most fundamental challenge in global regulatory monitoring. What makes this particularly daunting is that these frameworks often conflict among each other, which creates compliance dilemmas where adhering to one jurisdiction’s rules might violate another’s.

According to KPMG’s analysis, 2025 is witnessing “expanded regulatory divergence” with a combination of new administration policies, leadership changes across regulatory agencies, and growing global regulatory discord. This divergence manifests in the following ways:

Conflicting Requirements: A pharmaceutical company operating in the US, EU, and Asia might face different clinical trial requirements, data privacy regulations, and marketing authorization processes for the same product. What’s approved in one jurisdiction might be prohibited in another.

Varying Timelines: Regulatory submission deadlines, reporting frequencies, and implementation timelines differ across jurisdictions. While the EU might require quarterly reporting, the US might demand monthly submissions, and Asian markets might have entirely different schedules.

Challenge 2: Information Overload and Data Quality Issues

The sheer volume of regulatory information being generated globally has reached unprecedented levels. Regulatory bodies worldwide publish thousands of updates, amendments, and new requirements daily, creating an information tsunami that can overwhelm even the most sophisticated monitoring systems.

The challenge for organizations in 2025 and beyond is to “improve data quality across all regimes, reduce spikes across new data fields/validations and reduce error rates”. This challenge manifests in several critical areas:

Volume vs. Relevance: Organizations receive hundreds of regulatory alerts daily, but only a fraction are relevant to their operations. The challenge lies in developing sophisticated filtering mechanisms that can distinguish between noise and actionable intelligence. One way to receive only relevant alterts based on your product category, market and frequency is by using Freya.Alerts. Know more here.

Data Accuracy and Timeliness: Legacy systems and fragmented infrastructure throughout the data supply chain are obstacles to efficient reporting processes with high-quality data. When regulatory information is delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate, it can lead to compliance failures with severe consequences.

Source Reliability: Not all regulatory information sources are equal. Organizations must evaluate the credibility and timeliness of various sources, from official government publications to industry newsletters and legal analyses. Check out Freya.Regulations where our experts ensure that regulatory information meets the highest standards of accuracy and credibility.

Language and Translation Barriers: Global regulatory monitoring often involves documents in multiple languages, requiring accurate translation and interpretation of complex legal concepts that don’t always have direct equivalents across languages.

The cost of poor data quality in regulatory monitoring extends beyond immediate compliance risks. Organizations waste tons of resources investigating false positives, implementing unnecessary changes, and dealing with the effects of poor-quality regulatory intelligence.

Challenge 3: Resource Constraints and Expertise Gaps

Let’s talk about the elephant in the room: you probably don’t have enough people, budget, or expertise to handle comprehensive regulatory monitoring. You’re not alone, this is perhaps the most universal challenge organizations face.

Budget Limitations: Comprehensive regulatory monitoring requires significant investment in technology, personnel, and ongoing training. If you’re at a smaller company, you’ve probably had those uncomfortable conversations about justifying these expenses against other business priorities. “Do we really need another compliance tool?” Sound familiar?

Specialized Knowledge Requirements: Effective regulatory monitoring demands expertise across multiple domains such as legal, technical, industry-specific, and geographic. With 23% of jobs expected to change in the next five years, the skills gap in regulatory expertise is widening.

Talent Acquisition and Retention: Qualified regulatory professionals are in high demand and short supply. These experts must understand the regulatory landscape, the business context and technological tools needed for effective monitoring.

Balancing Internal vs. External Resources: You’re constantly weighing how much regulatory monitoring to handle internally versus outsourcing to specialized firms. It’s a delicate balance between cost, control, and expertise. Get it wrong, and you’re either overspending or losing critical oversight.

Geographic Expertise: Global regulatory monitoring requires region-specific knowledge that goes beyond language skills. Understanding local regulatory culture, enforcement patterns, and political dynamics is crucial for accurate interpretation of regulatory changes.

Addressing Resource Constraints Through Technology – Organizations facing these multifaceted resource challenges can leverage regulatory intelligence platforms like Freya.Intelligence. It offers a strategic approach to overcoming resource limitations by significantly reducing research time, eliminating language barriers, and providing real-time updates in a centralized platform.

Challenge 4: Technological Integration and Automation Challenges

Technology was supposed to solve everything, right? While it promises to tackle many regulatory monitoring challenges, implementing effective technological solutions often creates its own headaches:

Legacy System Integration: Many organizations struggle with legacy systems and fragmented infrastructure throughout the data supply chain, making it difficult to implement modern regulatory monitoring tools.

Data Privacy and Security: Regulatory monitoring systems must themselves comply with data protection regulations while processing sensitive regulatory information. This creates a complex compliance-within-compliance scenario.

Scalability and Flexibility: Technology solutions must be able to scale with business growth and adapt to changing regulatory requirements. Many systems that work well for limited use cases fail when expanded globally.

Integration Complexity: Regulatory monitoring systems must integrate with existing compliance, legal, and business systems. This integration often requires significant customization and ongoing maintenance.

The technological challenge is compounded by the need for systems that can handle multiple languages, different regulatory formats, and varying data quality standards across jurisdictions.

Challenge 5: Keeping Pace with Rapid Regulatory Evolution

The life sciences industry faces unprecedented acceleration in regulatory change, driven by breakthrough technologies and shifting global health priorities. Companies must now monitor more regulatory domains from personalized medicine to digital therapeutics while navigating entirely new categories like AI-driven drug discovery and gene editing that lack historical precedents.

The COVID-19 pandemic also altered regulatory frameworks, accelerating changes in clinical trials, emergency authorizations, and manufacturing standards. Political transitions and new agency leadership create additional uncertainty, while cross-border regulatory contagion means changes in major jurisdictions like the FDA or EMA trigger global ripple effects.

The real challenge isn’t keeping up with current changes, it’s developing predictive capabilities to anticipate future regulatory developments.

Best Practices for Overcoming These Challenges

Organizations must adopt risk-based monitoring to focus on high-impact jurisdictions, supported by RegTech tools that automate tracking and deliver real-time insights. Cross-functional collaboration between compliance, legal, IT, and business teams ensures that regulatory intelligence is integrated across operations. Strategic partnerships with specialized firms and tech providers can further strengthen internal capabilities and provide access to niche expertise.

Equally critical is building a sustainable monitoring framework, one that standardizes processes for assessing regulatory changes, analyzing their impact, and tracking implementation across regions. Regular training ensures teams are equipped to interpret evolving regulations and make the most of monitoring tools. To maintain credibility and effectiveness, companies must also enforce robust quality assurance through audits and source reliability checks, ensuring regulatory decisions are based on accurate, timely intelligence.

Conclusion

The challenges facing global regulatory monitoring in 2025 are complex, interconnected, and evolving rapidly. These challenges also present opportunities for organizations that can develop sophisticated, strategic approaches to regulatory monitoring. By investing in the right combination of technology, expertise, and processes, companies can transform regulatory monitoring from a compliance burden into a competitive advantage.

The key to success lies in recognizing that regulatory monitoring is not just about avoiding penalties – it’s about enabling informed business decisions, identifying market opportunities, and building sustainable competitive advantages in an increasingly regulated world.

If you are struggling with the challenges outlined in this article, you’re not alone. The complexity of global regulatory monitoring has reached a tipping point where traditional approaches are no longer sufficient.

Freya Intelligence is revolutionizing how organizations approach regulatory monitoring with our cutting-edge AI-powered regulatory intelligence platform.

Take the chaos out of compliance. Start your 14-day free trial of Freya.Intelligence today and see how leading regulatory teams are staying one step ahead.